Lindsay Lohan Hints Sex Tape Stolen

OK, there is no other way to put it. Lindsay Lohan's home break-in this week seems to have been an inside job and seems to revolve around a sex tape and not a traditional robbery.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to parse these words into what she really meant in a tweet posted though Lindsay's personal twitter account: "things that a certain old friend knew meant a lot to me" were taken. A safe full of items was stolen. Sources believe scandalous documents and most likely videos are part of the booty.

Meanwhile LAPD investigators believe they have their suspects in their sights. With video surveillance recordings in hand, they are now looking for one male and two females ages 18 to 25. They entered Lohan's home through an unlocked door entering a court yard at approximately 1:10 am Sunday morning. According to police the suspects covered their faces with scarves.

Leslie Sloane-Zelnik, Lohan's spokesperson commented: "personal belongings were taken without remorse." It appears whomever hit her home, took things of deep affection. We can only hope Lindsay gets her personal keepsakes back.

Meanwhile in a stunning move of modern police work, the LAPD has released video of the break on on YouTube, if you know these people the LAPD want to hear from you.

Reward For Josh Hartnett Sex Tape

Actor Josh Hartnett has gotten himself into some hot water over in London. It seems the actor was caught on a hotel surveillance tape that allegedly shows the actor getting it on with an unidentified female in a London library.

An adult video company is offering up approx. $500,000 dollars to the person who has this tape if they turn it in! WHOA! Worried about hurting Hartnett's feelings?

Red Light District CEO David Joseph said he would "encourage the owners of the tape to bring it to us," and that "Josh shouldn’t be embarrassed. As we've seen with Paris Hilton, these tapes can make a career not hurt it."

Sept. 9th UPDATE: Josh Hartnett is suing the British tabloid, BBC News reports. He is seeking damages and an apology from the Daily Mirror, for allegations that were "defamatory and unsubstantiated" and a "complete fabrication," his lawyer said in a statement.

R. Kelly cleared on all child-porn charges

After less than a day of deliberations, R. Kelly was found not guilty of 14 counts of videotaping himself having sex with a minor.

Although it took more than six years for the case to reach the Chicago courtroom, it only took seven hours for the jurors to conclude there was enough reasonable doubt for the R&B singer to avoid serving four to 15 years behind bars. If he was found guilty, he would have had to register as an Illinois sex offender.

The case began in February 2002 after Chicago Sun-Times music critic Jim DeRogatis was sent a copy of the now-infamous videotape allegedly featuring Kelly engaging in sexual acts with an underaged girl. The tape was turned over to authorities, but the trial was delayed numerous times. It finally reached the courtroom last month.

One of the possible causes for the jurors skepticism was the mole on the back of the man in the video, which prosecuters used to identify Kelly. The 41-year-old singer's lawyers called on a forensic expert to prove the videotape may have been manipulated to purposely frame Kelly. They also suggested the poor quality of the video may have caused a shadow to look like a mole.

Several other people took the stand on behalf of the defense to call into question the credibility of the prosecuter's witnesses. One such woman was Lisa Van Allen, another woman in the video. After the verdict was read, Van Allen told the Chicago Sun-Times that she believed Kelly's "star power" swayed the jury.

"R. Kelly was found not guilty, because they had the best jury that Cook County could produce," Kelly's attorney, Sam Adam Jr. said outside the courtroom.

R. Kelly did not testify before the juror, nor did the now-23-year-old alleged victim, who refused to cooperate with the Cook County District Attorney's Office.

Jimi Hendrix Sex Tape to Be Released

A sex tape rumored to star Jimi Hendrix has been obtained by LA adult film company, Vivid Entertainment.

The footage allegedly features the guitar icon engaging in several sex acts with two women in a hotel room during the late 1960s.

Vivid, who recently received the film from a collector, had it tested for authenticity and claims that the tape is indeed real.

Vivid Entertainment has previously released the sex tapes of Kim Kardahsian and Pam Anderson.

Was Marilyn Monroe sex tape a hoax?

According to leading Marilyn Monroe expert Mark Bellinghaus, the 16 mm film footage of the star engaging in oral sex with an unidentified man is a hoax.

New York City based memorabilia collector Keya Morgan made headlines last week when he announced he sold the 15 minute tape to a wealthy New York businessman for $1.5 million dollars. The man said he would keep the tape from public view out of respect for the screen siren.

"You can see instantly that it's Marilyn Monroe; she has the famous mole. She's smiling, she's very charming, she's very radiant, but she's known for being radiant," Morgan said, as quoted on Defamer.com's post "Exclusive: Debunking The Marilyn Monroe 'Sex Tape' Hoax."

But Bellinghaus said after talking to Morgan on the phone for several hours, he has concluded that there are too many holes in the collector's story. He went on to describe Morgan as a "press hungry namedropper whose main objective is to promote himself and the Monroe documentary that he is working on."

"What Keya Morgan is promoting equates to questionable stories generated simply to sell another book or push another cheesy documentary," Bellinghaus told Defamer. "At the time of our conversation with him, we immediately discerned that he was one of them only out to exploit Marilyn Monroe and to come up with something new to fuel the rumour mill of her life."

"Keya Morgan's time in the spotlight for this recent spin is nothing more than an opportunity for him to do just that - soak up some extra time in the limelight with his invented story about a fake flick, at the expense of the legacy of Marilyn Monroe."